preferences

Bitcoin – Currency or Commodity For Purposes of §550 And Avoidance Actions? What About Claims?

02/29/16

bitcoin-logo-3d-1024x1024Bitcoin – currency, the equivalent of U.S. dollars, or a commodity more similar to a product or stock?

[more]

CPI Corp. Preference Actions Filed

04/30/15

From April 24 to 27, 2015, Charles A. Stanziale, Jr., as the Chapter 7 Trustee of CPI Corp., et al., filed preference complaints seeking to avoid and recover alleged preferential transfers pursuant to Sections 547 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code, and to disallow claims of the defendants pursuant to Section 502(d).

[more]

How to Stop a Wage Garnishment in Georgia and Get Your Money Back

02/05/14

judgment creditorAlmost without exception my clients who are subject to wage garnishment in Georgia report that they feel “violated” or “horrified” by discoveri

[more]

How to Stop a Wage Garnishment in Georgia and Get Your Money Back

02/05/14

judgment creditorAlmost without exception my clients who are subject to wage garnishment in Georgia report that they feel “violated” or “horrified” by discoveri

[more]

Adbox Redux: Who Must Prove and Disprove Earmarking

07/23/07

In the previous post, I commented on In re Adbox, Inc., 2007 WL 1584582 (9th Cir. June 4, 2007), a case which explains the maybe not so obvious – why can’t creditors counterclaim in an avoidance action and offset their claims against their disgorgement liability?

[more]

Adbox Redux: Who Must Prove and Disprove Earmarking

07/23/07

In the previous post, I commented on In re Adbox, Inc., 2007 WL 1584582 (9th Cir. June 4, 2007), a case which explains the maybe not so obvious – why can’t creditors counterclaim in an avoidance action and offset their claims against their disgorgement liability?

[more]

Counterclaims in Avoidance Actions? Are We Sure We Know Why Not?

07/21/07

If you have defended a few preference actions, I’ll bet that you’ve heard this one from your client more than once: “Can I countersue them for what they owe me?" The obvious (to a bankruptcy lawyer) and correct response is “no,” but you might not have been 100% glib if called upon to explain why. Now the Ninth Circuit has come to your rescue, and you can just say “In re Adbox, Inc., 2007 WL 1584582 (9th Cir. June 4, 2007).

[more]

Counterclaims in Avoidance Actions? Are We Sure We Know Why Not?

07/21/07

If you have defended a few preference actions, I’ll bet that you’ve heard this one from your client more than once: “Can I countersue them for what they owe me?" The obvious (to a bankruptcy lawyer) and correct response is “no,” but you might not have been 100% glib if called upon to explain why. Now the Ninth Circuit has come to your rescue, and you can just say “In re Adbox, Inc., 2007 WL 1584582 (9th Cir. June 4, 2007).

[more]