SouthFloridaBankruptcyLawBlog

11th Circuit Issues 2 Section 506 Decisions

10/01/14

Two days, two chapter 7 section 506 decisions by the the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.  On September 29, 2014, the Court issued its decision in In re Phillip, 2014 WL 4802758 (11th Cir. Sept. 29, 2014)(not selected for publication). On September 30, 2014, the Court issued its decision in In re Vaner Iest, 2014 WL  4825253 (11th Cir. Sept. 30, 2014)(not selected for publication).  The mortgage lender in both cases was Bank of America, N.A.

[more]

11th Circuit: "Be Sure Your Sin Will Catch Up with You"

09/26/14

A few days ago, the 11th Circuit  Court of Appeals issued its decision in the case of Airtran Airways, Inc., v. Brenda Elem, et al., case 13-11738 (11th Cir. Sept. 23, 2014).

[more]

Good Advice from the Romans

09/24/14

Post hoc ergo propter hoc (

[more]

Mortgages: Statute of Limitations, Quiet Title Actions, Etc.

09/20/14

In the aftermath of the real estate mortgage foreclosure crisis in Florida since 2008, there have been presented to the court questions of the enforceability of mortgages under various circumstances, including after the dismissal of foreclose cases.

[more]

Preservation of Error and the Civil Plain Error Rule

09/17/14
The recent Middle District of Florida decision in In re Nabavi, 2014 WL 3939595 (M.D.
[more]

Indictment for Bankruptcy Crime in Palm Beach County

09/15/14

An indictment a few days ago against a chapter 7 debtor in Palm Beach County provides an occasion to review the bankruptcy crimes provisions of title 18 of the United States Code.  This indictment gives credence to the rule of thumb to beware of the debtor who mentions the words "Rolex watch." 

[more]

Finality and its Three Exceptions

09/14/14

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals recent decision in In re Donald J.

[more]

"Party Aggrieved" Requirement for Appeal of a Bankruptcy Court Order

09/11/14

On September 4, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision focusing on the "party aggrieved" doctrine in the case of

[more]