Creditors' Committee in Precision Parts International Bankruptc...

01/06/11

Introduction

In December of 2010, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the "Committee"), in the Precision Parts International ("PPI") bankruptcy commenced several avoidance actions against various creditors of PPI.  As reflected in the Committee's complaints, on November 12, 2010, the Delaware Bankruptcy Court entered an order granting the Committee derivative standing to prosecute avoidance actions on behalf of the PPI bankruptcy estate.  This post will look briefly at the nature of PPI's business, why the company filed for bankruptcy and provide information relevant to avoidance actions.

Background

PPI filed for bankruptcy in Delaware on December 12, 2008.  As stated in the Declaration in Support of PPI's First Day Motions,  at the time it filed for bankruptcy, PPI designed and manufactured metal stamping in a process known as "fineblanking."  In addition to the automotive market, PPI sold its products to the construction, agriculture and lawn and garden industries.  Based in Rochester Hills, Michigan, PPI operated six manufacturing facilities in North America.  Read the PPI petition for bankruptcy here.

Why PPI Filed for Bankruptcy

PPI's success was tied, in large part, to the U.S. auto industry.  Almost 40% of PPI's revenue in 2007 came from sales to manufacturers in the automotive industry.  Lower volume in the auto industry, combined with higher steel prices, reduced PPI's revenue and cash flow, which in turn led to bankruptcy.  As reported in the media, PPI sold most of its assets to Cerion LLC in 2009.  Cerion is a privately held manufacturing firm located in Michigan. 

 Issues Relevant to Avoidance Actions

For readers not generally familiar with avoidance actions, below are prior posts I have written on the subject:  

Decision in Archway Cookies Grants Summary Judgment Based on Ordinary Course of Business Defense

Using the Solvency Defense in a Preference Action: In re Bernard Technologies

Recent Decision in Pillowtex Addresses Elements of the Ordinary Course of Business Defense in a Preference Action

Defending Avoidance Actions: The "Settlement Payment" Safe Harbor Receives Broad Interpretation Under In re Elrod Holdings

-------------------------------------------------------------

Jason Cornell practices with the law firm Fox Rothschild LLP in Wilmington, Delaware.  You can reach Jason at 302 427 5512, or [email protected]

[more]