Bankruptcy Blogs

Bankruptcy Landscape is Turning Grey

05/28/07

This will come as no surprise to practitioners in the trenches of consumer bankruptcy law, but . . . . the face of America’s debtor population is acquiring wrinkles. According to a study just released by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, the average age of debtors in bankruptcy is increasing at a much faster rate than the age of the general population.

[more]

Its Not Final Until Its Over

05/27/07

A little understood aspect of the automatic stay is the effect of a bankruptcy filing on a judgment debtor’s appeal rights. Contrary to what you might think, when a judgment is entered in a pre-bankruptcy action against the debtor, prosecution of the debtor’s appeal of that judgment is subject to the automatic stay. This is on the rationale that the appeal is a “continuation of an action” against the debtor. See, Parker v. Bain, 63 F.3d 1131, 1135-36 (9th Cir. 1995).

[more]

Its Not Final Until Its Over

05/27/07

A little understood aspect of the automatic stay is the effect of a bankruptcy filing on a judgment debtor’s appeal rights. Contrary to what you might think, when a judgment is entered in a pre-bankruptcy action against the debtor, prosecution of the debtor’s appeal of that judgment is subject to the automatic stay. This is on the rationale that the appeal is a “continuation of an action” against the debtor. See, Parker v. Bain, 63 F.3d 1131, 1135-36 (9th Cir. 1995).

[more]

A New Kind of Tax Shelter That Also Doesn’t Work, and Why Do Molehills Turn Into Mountains?

05/13/07

James and Beverly Nichols filed their 2001 federal income tax return on January 20, 2002. The return showed that they were entitled to a refund in the amount of $2,231.57. They checked the box on their return, making the irrevocable election to apply that amount to payment of future taxes, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6513(d). Sixteen days later, the Nichols filed their chapter 7 petition.

[more]

A New Kind of Tax Shelter That Also Doesn’t Work, and Why Do Molehills Turn Into Mountains?

05/13/07

James and Beverly Nichols filed their 2001 federal income tax return on January 20, 2002. The return showed that they were entitled to a refund in the amount of $2,231.57. They checked the box on their return, making the irrevocable election to apply that amount to payment of future taxes, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6513(d). Sixteen days later, the Nichols filed their chapter 7 petition.

[more]

Chapter 11 Plan Feasibility and the Judgment on Appeal - Its Either the Long Wait Or the Educated Guess

05/06/07

Chapter 11 filings are often precipitated by the entry of a judgment against the debtor which is appealed. The parties must then argue about whether a chapter 11 plan is feasible and otherwise confirmable in the light of uncertainty over the amount of what might be the debtor's biggest liability.

[more]

Chapter 11 Plan Feasibility and the Judgment on Appeal - Its Either the Long Wait Or the Educated Guess

05/06/07

Chapter 11 filings are often precipitated by the entry of a judgment against the debtor which is appealed. The parties must then argue about whether a chapter 11 plan is feasible and otherwise confirmable in the light of uncertainty over the amount of what might be the debtor's biggest liability.

[more]

BAPCPA For Your Viewing Pleasure

05/02/07

On Tuesday the House Committee on the Judiciary held a day long hearing on the second anniversary of the enactment of BAPCPA. Before I assumed the responsibilities of a blogger, I didn't know that Congressional hearings were given snappy titles. The title of this hearing asked the question (no, I'm not making this up) "Are Consumers Really Being Protected Under the Act?"

[more]

BAPCPA For Your Viewing Pleasure

05/02/07

On Tuesday the House Committee on the Judiciary held a day long hearing on the second anniversary of the enactment of BAPCPA. Before I assumed the responsibilities of a blogger, I didn't know that Congressional hearings were given snappy titles. The title of this hearing asked the question (no, I'm not making this up) "Are Consumers Really Being Protected Under the Act?"

[more]

Security Is More Than A Feeling

05/02/07

Section 101(37) of the Bankruptcy Code defines “lien” as a “charge against or interest in property to secure payment of a debt . . . .” and section 101(51) defines “security interest” as a “lien created by an agreement.” Most of us who get hired to enforce homemade loan documents have encountered a promissory note or other contract that clearly contemplates the application of specific property to pay the debt in the event of a default, but which doesn’t exactly say “Joe grants a security interest to Bob.”

[more]