A recent decision reminds creditors of the harsh consequences of failing to comply with a court imposed deadline for filing claims in a bankruptcy case. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently held in Ellis v. Westinghouse that claims accruing after confirmation of a chapter 11 plan, but before the plan goes effective, are subject to the administrative claim deadline established by the plan.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently became the first circuit court to address the question of whether a corporate parent can set off an obligation that it owes to a bankrupt company against a claim owed by such company to the parent’s subsidiary. A couple of years ago, in the chapter 11 case of Orexigen Therapeutics in the District of Delaware, former Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross denied a motion to allow such a “triangular” setoff.
In SuVicMon Development, Inc. v. Morrison, __ F.3d __, 2021 WL 1136546 (11th Cir. March 25, 2021) (click here for .pdf), the plaintiffs are three corporations that sued the Debtor for fraud and securities violations in state court.
he Federal Reserve warned of significant risks of business bankruptcies and steep drops in commercial real estate prices in a report published on Friday.
https://www.georgiabankruptcyblog.com/files/2022/01/Roth-IRA-300x173.jpg 300w, 
http://www.georgiabankruptcyblog.com/files/2021/03/Student-Loan-Debt-2-3... 300w, 
http://www.georgiabankruptcyblog.com/files/2021/03/13th-Amendemnt-300x12... 300w, 
http://www.georgiabankruptcyblog.com/files/2021/02/nuclear-missile-300x2... 300w, 
